The Homeopathic Treatment of Autism: Olive’s Story

In the fall of 2010, Emma brought her 5 year old daughter Olive to my office for an initial classical homeopathic consultation. Olive was diagnosed with autism soon after receiving her MMR vaccination at 18 months of age. “Within a week after she got her MMR vaccination, we noticed a difference. The daycare told us they thought Olive couldn’t hear. People would call her name and she wouldn’t look at them, people would stomp their feet and she wouldn’t respond. We got her hearing tested but there was nothing wrong with her hearing. We then got her assessed and she was diagnosed with autism.”

I asked Emma about Olive’s language skills. “She knows about 30 words but can’t put them in sentences together. She will just say the individual words.” I then did a complete and thorough assessment of Olive’s symptoms. I observed Olive’s behaviour and asked Emma a long series of questions about Olive’s personality, food preferences, sleep habits, likes and dislikes, as well as a thorough questioning of her physical symptoms. As a classical homeopath, I always prescribe based on the whole person, so I must get a complete picture of both the mental and physical symptoms. Once the initial consultation was over, I analyzed my notes and came up with a constitutional homeopathic remedy that suited Olive as a whole person (mentally and physically).

What is a Constitutional Homeopathic Remedy?

Constitutional homeopathic remedies are prescribed by classical homeopaths. Although naturopaths have some limited training in prescribing homeopathic remedies, only classical homeopaths have enough training (a full 4 years) to prescribe constitutionally. Constitutional homeopathic prescribing for chronic health complaints is extremely powerful and complex and must be regarded with the utmost respect.

Homeopathic remedies are made from something in the natural world such as a plant, mineral or animal. Constitutional homeopathic remedies are given one at a time and never in combination. The remedies are prepared in such a way that they are non-toxic and gentle on the body. They stimulate the body to heal itself. Remedy selection is based on the homeopathic principle that “like cures like” – that is, a substance that would cause symptoms in a healthy person is used to cure those same symptoms in illness. For example, one homeopathic remedy which might be used in a person suffering from insomnia is coffea, a remedy made from coffee.

The First Follow-up

Olive came to my office for her first follow-up 6 weeks later. Emma tells me, “After giving Olive her homeopathic remedy, the autism started to disappear. It was incredible. She was more aware of surroundings. She would notice somebody walking through the door. She became very attentive at school. I could communicate with her.”

I told Emma to repeat the remedy only every 2 weeks, since Olive is on a high potency (high strength) of the remedy. In some cases even one single dose of a remedy can last for weeks or even months.

The Second Follow-up

Emma walks into the office with a smile on her face, “Everything is fantastic at school. She’s concentrating and focusing more. School is unbelievable. Words are coming out right, left and center. She answered questions about a story, was contemplating on what the picture was. She answered all four questions correctly. The teachers were freaking out, she was ready to call me on my cell phone. Her progression has been huge. She’s doing phenomenal. Teachers are noticing she’s becoming more verbal.”

After only a few short months Olive has responded amazingly well to her constitutional homeopathic remedy. I expect to continue to see improvements over time. I am happy beyond words to see what a difference homeopathy has made for Emma, Olive and their family.

Fitness Goop Publishing Disclaimer

The information provided on this website is for educational and informational purposes only. It should not be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed practitioner or health care provider. The opinions expressed here are not necessarily those of Fitness Goop Inc. or its affiliates. Different views may appear in future articles or publications. Information on fitnessgoop.com is copyrighted and must not be reprinted, duplicated, or transmitted without permission.

About Sonya McLeod

Sonya was born and raised in Vancouver, BC, Canada. She graduated from the University of British Columbia with a Bachelor of Arts degree. After giving birth to her second child, Sonya came down with allergies and fatigue so severe that she was no longer able to care for her young children properly. As a last resort, Sonya tried homeopathy, and was finally able to recover from her illness and live a normal life again. After experiencing the effectiveness of homeopathy first-hand, she then decided to pursue it as a career. Sonya earned a practitioner diploma in classical homeopathy after 4 years of study at the Vancouver of Homeopathic Academy. Currently, Sonya practices classical homeopathy in her own private clinic, Little Mountain Homeopathy.
Sonya is currently a regular contributor for the popular online alternative health publication Natural News. She has also published two articles in local alternative weekly The Georgia Straight. She was a guest on JoyTV’s “P3: People, Places, Perspectives.” Sonya is also a contributor for the local online magazine Babyvibe. She is a proud member of the Birth Lounge, a local professional women's health collective offering products and services supporting families through pregnancy, birth and postpartum. Sonya has her certification in Reiki Level 1, as well as Gemmotherapy. Other alternative modalities that she has studied include yoga, fasting, herbalism, Bach Flower remedies and Schussler Cell Salts. She is an avid supporter of the Weston A. Price Foundation, an advocacy group that promotes the consumption of whole foods and raw milk.
She and her husband Usman are parents to two lovely girls aged 5 and 6. Both of her children were born at home under the care of a midwife. One of the births was a water birth.

  • http://prenatalcoach.com Crystal – Prenatal Coach

    This is so GREAT to hear Sonya! Thanks for sharing this story. Homeopathy is so powerful (yet gentle) and with children (and pets!) there is no 'placebo effect' so we know that it's truly working!

    Thank you for being so brave and continuing to speak about homeopathy so publicly despite the criticisms that have come your way from previous articles you've written.

  • Sonya McLeod

    Thanks Crystal, I appreciate the support. I know that once enough people are educated about homeopathy in North America it will spread like wildfire, and will become as popular as it is in South America, Europe and India. 

  • barry the spider

    Total bullshit!

  • Dana's baby brother

    Learn more about the placebo effect, well known to work in children and animals, where the carer knows the 'patient' getting 'treatment.

  • http://twitter.com/Crommunist Crommunist

    Homeopathy is magic! Here's my success story.

  • http://twitter.com/Crommunist Crommunist

    Crystal – the only way to know whether or not homeopathy doesn't elicit the placebo effect is to test it AGAINST a placebo (i.e. give one group homeopathic treatments, give the other group placebos). Do you know what happens EVERY TIME you do that?

  • http://twitter.com/Crommunist Crommunist

    Ah, like England and Belgium where the state regulatory authorities have looked at the evidence for homeopathy and determined that it doesn't work and shouldn't be funded? Is that the European education and popularity you're hoping for?

  • http://prenatalcoach.com Crystal – Prenatal Coach

    Great! I have no issues at all with the placebo effect! The fact that the care provider knows the 'patient' is getting treatment and it helps make them better is incredibly powerful and a bonus in my mind :)

  • Sonya McLeod

    The article speaks for itself, you guys lost this round, stop being such a sore loser.
    http://www.littlemountainhomeo

  • disapproves

    Because anecdotal evidence is so convincing when completely unsupported by the facts.

  • Sonya McLeod

    The fact is that she got better from homeopathy

  • Hittman

    What a great story!  You start with completely discredited complaint (vaccines do not, CAN not, cause autism) and then treat an illness with completely discredited protocol.  

    In other words, you fooled some stupid people.  How impressive!

  • The Amazing Psychic Steve

    Actually, I knew little Olive and I made her better.  You see, I actually have psychic powers and used my mind to destroy the evil demons that were causing her autism.  I know it sounds crazy, but I put my hands to my head and she got better!  You can't argue with that FACT.

  • Nick-Nack-Paddywack

    It doesn't make the pet better. It makes the owner *think* the pet is better. It's called confirmation bias. http://www.sciencedaily.com/ar

  • http://crommunist.wordpress.com/ Crommunist

    Yeah, that's cute; except that your article has been thoroughly debunked already.

  • http://crommunist.wordpress.com/ Crommunist

    So you're okay with lying to your clients, TELLING them they're getting effective treatment when they aren't – in order to elicit the placebo effect?

    Yikes.

  • Mehmed

    From your link:

    In
    13 matched sets the placebo effect in the homeopathic trials was larger
    than the average placebo effect of the conventional trials, in 12
    matched sets it was lower (P=0.39).This shows that half the study showed it worked, the other half showed it didn't work.  FAIL

  • Ron

    More people open to the possibilities that Homeopathy may work in treating autism..  http://www.oprah.com/community

  • Sonya McLeod

    Wow, so are you calling people in Europe, all of South America and India stupid? Not only are you completely ignorant and xenophobic, you're also a racist. Also if you're not a supporter of alternative health you should get off this site, this site is for people who are interested in alternative health and who are interested in treatments that are non-toxic and actually work, instead of contributing to poor health (e.g. allopathic treatments).

  • Bitbucket

    Noooo, the fact is that she had homeopathic “treatment,” and also she got better. You have not demonstrated any causal relationship between these events.

  • WannabeVagabond

    You seem to be falling into a logical fallacy here: Fact one: Hittman believes homeopathy is stupid. Fact 2: SOME people in South America, Europe and India practice homeopathy. The jump to the idea that Fact 1 + Fact 2 = Hittman thinks all people in these countries are dumb and therefor is a racist is in no way logically sound, for numerous reasons including (but not limited to) the fact that not every person in these areas believes in it (ie to be Indian or South American is not a guarantor of belief in homeopathy) and you have no reason to believe that hittman does not himself ascribe himself to one of these nationalities/ethnicties. If you would like to make a comment in defense of homeopathies legitimacy I think you need to lay off such sensational and outright false rhetoric if you wish to be taken seriously (I see you make no actual defense of any kind actually) He is also completely correct in his statement of MMR not causing autism; this has been proven numerous times by numerous studies by different groups, the original article has been retracted from The Lancet, everyone who has ever had anything to do with that paper has taken there name off of it, and the doctor in charge of it lost his right to practice medicine due to his very questionable methods.

  • WannabeVagabond

    Wait, first you say there is no placebo effect and then you say you have no problem with there being one. Which is it? You do realize placebo effect is the absence of the homeopathy doing ANYTHING physically, yes? So you are admitting that homeopathy does nothing?

  • WannabeVagabond

    Their right is not in question here, the ability for homeopathy to work is and quite frankly Oprah has had numerous little pet project tat ended up being completely bunk so I'm not sure what that link is supposed to prove. Last I checked she was a tv personality, not a doctor or scientist or anyone with any medical background period. Sorry, but if I want to cure my kid of a disease I'm sure as hell not taking the advice of Maury or Jerry Springer so why would I take hers?

  • Bitbucket

    Accusing someone of racism based on something YOU, not THEY, said, is a low blow, even for a homeopath. I daresay you will not find many real medical practitioners acting so unprofessionally.

  • WannabeVagabond

    So you say, and it's not as if you have anything invested in that claim right? Oh, wait…

    The fact of the matter is that anecdotal evidence has no use in proving claims of effectiveness in any type of medical treatment because of the placebo effect and that, quite frankly, is all you have on your side. Even the link you yourself provided did not lend credence to homeopathy (the link YOU provided).

    All you are doing is proving how you manage to exploit people's ignorance of medicine, statistics and science in order to keep selling your snake oil.

    As for Olive, I imagine she is undergoing special classes and therapy to assist with her autism which have been shown to reliably help with the very symptoms you have taken credit for. I see no advantage in what you claim to have done and what happens very typically with many autistic children given the right assistance.

  • Sonya McLeod

    Watch videos and read more stories about how homeopathy helps autism: http://www.littlemountainhomeo

  • Gary

    That article from 1997 claims a stronger-than-placebo effect (odds ratio 2.45) from a meta-analysis of earlier studies of homeopathy versus placebo.  But the authors of the study caution that these analysis must be taken interpreted cautiously, because publication bias will overestimate  towards a favored outcome.  The authors qualify their findings further by noting “that more rigorous trials have less-promising results” and that “that a number of the new high-quality trials…have negative results”.

    The largest, most high quality  meta-analysis to date was conducted in 2005:http://www.thelancet.com/journ… authors find that the odds-ratio for high quality studies yields (ie 1.12 times better than placebo) for homeopathic remedies, so just barely better. More importantly, it shows that as the quality of the trial improves, the odds ratio approaches one (no effect).  Considering all the other confounding factors that can account for a positive result (natural healing, lifestyle changes,  publishing standards, selective statistics, publication bias) a 1.12xbetter than placebo effect for homeopathy is weaker than the solutions that homeopaths prepare for their patients. So what are you arguing here, that homeopathy is better than allopathy because of the weak evidence that its minimally better than a placebo?  Even if you do, how do you dismiss the massive amounts of strong evidence in favor of conventional medical interventions?

    Your critics have hardly 'lost this round', Sonya, and you do yourself a disservice to tell your critics to not comment on the shortcomings of your claims, or to accuse them of being racists because they point out that the claim that mmr causes autism is thoroughy and excruciatingly discredited, then telling them to 'get off this site', which is the height of irony, isn't that what racists tell immigrants, 'go back to where you came from?'

  • WannabeVagabond

    This link is useless; it's entirely anecdotal and from very biased site. If homeopathy worked it would be extremely easy to conduct double blind studies and have the results published in peer reviewed journals. Keep in mind this is the type of rigorous testing any new medicine or procedure has to go through to be proven, so I'm not sure what makes you think you're so magically special that you are somehow exempt from it in order be taken seriously by the medical community. You can call prejudice or closed-mindedness all you want but the fact remains that if the results you claim are true then they are VERY easy to prove in the form I've laid out. Provide me with one or two of those from a neutral source and then you'll have my attention. Until then I remain convinced that you are effectively stealing money from sick and desperate people and selling them water.